<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-2"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parlement uni- sau bicameral?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calh.eu/2010/02/parlement-uni-sau-bicameral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calh.eu/2010/02/parlement-uni-sau-bicameral/</link>
	<description>In loc de a scrie pe pereti</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:42:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Popularul</title>
		<link>http://calh.eu/2010/02/parlement-uni-sau-bicameral/comment-page-1/#comment-2184</link>
		<dc:creator>Popularul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calh.eu/?p=123#comment-2184</guid>
		<description>Corect. Nici eu nu cred ca este mai bine cu parlament unicameral, dar nu avem ce face deocamdata. Probabil ca parlamentarii actuali, ca sa-si apere pozitiile (sansele de realegere scad daca dispare o camera), vor incerca sa se nu respecte rezultatul referendumului. Deh, traim in Romania.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corect. Nici eu nu cred ca este mai bine cu parlament unicameral, dar nu avem ce face deocamdata. Probabil ca parlamentarii actuali, ca sa-si apere pozitiile (sansele de realegere scad daca dispare o camera), vor incerca sa se nu respecte rezultatul referendumului. Deh, traim in Romania.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

